Re: the Mathematics of Chess
From: Conya (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: Jon Haugsand: "Re: Confused on convex functions/sets"
- Previous message: Isaac: "Confused on convex functions/sets"
- In reply to: Ioannis: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:30:16 -0500
"Ioannis" <morpheus@olympus.mons> wrote in message
news:1097497716.194458@athnrd02...
> Jon Slaughter wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Anything that has patterns is mathematics.
> > Mathematics, in its most general scope, covers everything that has
> > intelligence...
>
> Except Bach's music, that is.
>
> > Mathematics is basic on logic, and if something isn't
> > logical, its not really math. But if it is, then one could possibly
study
> > it under a "mathematical microscope".
>
> Trying to study patterns in Bach's music, is a very sure way to the
> loony bin, cause it's the chicken and egg problem: The composer wasn't a
> mathematician, but his music contains nothing BUT math. And the music is
> beautiful, as well.
>
> [snip]
> --
> I. N. Galidakis --- http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/
Checkout "PDQ Bach", (for fun) some books and records out.
- Next message: Jon Haugsand: "Re: Confused on convex functions/sets"
- Previous message: Isaac: "Confused on convex functions/sets"
- In reply to: Ioannis: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
