Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT"
From: Dave Seaman (dseaman_at_no.such.host)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Expected duration of "pass the buck" game?"
- Previous message: Random Searcher: "Re: Methods that count primes without counting primes or referring to them..."
- In reply to: T.M.: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:30:43 +0000 (UTC)
On 11 Oct 2004 09:52:17 -0700, T.M. wrote:
> tuckpointer wrote:
> I am really greatful for your kind response.
>> The "basis for mathematics" was never decided. [...]
> Right. If I may quote another poster I tremendously respect and value,
> it is "turtles all the way down" (btw, I do not even know what it
> really means).
Google does.
-- Dave Seaman Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. <http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Expected duration of "pass the buck" game?"
- Previous message: Random Searcher: "Re: Methods that count primes without counting primes or referring to them..."
- In reply to: T.M.: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
