Re: Baseball skill vs. raw chance
From: Keith A. Lewis (lewis_at_PROBE.MITRE.ORG)
Date: 10/12/04
- Next message: James Harris: "Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?"
- Previous message: James Harris: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- In reply to: John0714: "Re: Baseball skill vs. raw chance"
- Next in thread: Lewis Mammel: "Re: Baseball skill vs. raw chance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
john0714@aol.comnojunk (John0714) writes in article <20041011200549.21613.00002051@mb-m10.aol.com> dated 12 Oct 2004 00:05:49 GMT:
>The regular season just ended three teams won over 97 games and three teams
>won less than 65 games. Nobody won exactly 97 or 65.
> I hope you can acess this URL
>
>http://aolsvc.cnnsi.sports.aol.com/baseball/mlb/standings/
That's pretty solid evidence that the results were more than just chance.
--Keith Lewis klewis {at} mitre.org
The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
- Next message: James Harris: "Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?"
- Previous message: James Harris: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- In reply to: John0714: "Re: Baseball skill vs. raw chance"
- Next in thread: Lewis Mammel: "Re: Baseball skill vs. raw chance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
