Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?

From: James Harris (jstevh_at_msn.com)
Date: 10/12/04 

Date: 11 Oct 2004 18:05:48 -0700

Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> wrote in message news:<zGlad.15013$gs1.3999@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> JSH has taken to ignoring threads that include counterexamples to his
> "theorems", instead preferring to repost in new threads whenever a
> counterexample comes up (usually adding some sob story about how he is being
> treated unfairly, or some bragging about how great he is and how trivial all
> this is for him).

You're trolling.

I, on the other hand, have gone head-to-head against the people
arguing with me, and even had a torturous series of posts with the
"Nora Baron" character, which ended at one point when that poster
deleted out EVERYTHING I'D PUT IN, which should be a concession to at
least some of you.

>
> So, I wonder if a counterexample and the accompanying explanation can be
> squeezed down small enough to fit into a standard usenet signature (4 lines,
> under 80 characters per line)? That would be amusing, and maybe JSH would
> not be able to ignore the counterexamples if a few people were including
> them in signatures.

Yup, you're a troll.

Sadly, at some point in these discussions, the trolls come out in
force to try and get in on some of that attention.

I think it's time to wrap things up, so they'll fade into the
background--where they belong.

James Harris