Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?
From: *** T. Winter (***.Winter_at_cwi.nl)
Date: 10/12/04
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: no comments?"
- Previous message: *** T. Winter: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?"
- Next in thread: Virgil: "Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:35:30 GMT
In article <3c65f87.0410111705.59af94c3@posting.google.com> jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) writes:
...
> > JSH has taken to ignoring threads that include counterexamples to his
> > "theorems", instead preferring to repost in new threads whenever a
> > counterexample comes up (usually adding some sob story about how he is
> > being treated unfairly, or some bragging about how great he is and how
> > trivial all this is for him).
>
> You're trolling.
I think not. On quite a few occasions I have come up with objections to the
second part of your three part exposition. You never came with a reply, but
always started with a new thread approximately with the same exposition.
-- *** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131 home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: no comments?"
- Previous message: *** T. Winter: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?"
- Next in thread: Virgil: "Re: Counterexample for JSH that fits in a signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]