Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT"
From: Keckman (keckman_at_welho.com)
Date: 10/12/04
- Next message: James Pirk: "Many algebra questions"
- Previous message: Robert Vienneau: "Re: bush tax cut and small businesses"
- In reply to: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:24:30 +0300
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:48:28 -0700, Immortalist
<Reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "You're very clever, young man, very clever," said the old lady. "But
> it's turtles all the way down."
>
Perhaps to the infinity?
That old lady is like math today.
Math have come to a conclusion, that from n=n+1 in Peano's axiom follow
that
N is infinity allthough that n=n+1 grows up as much bigness as amount of
numbers.
Math has put to Natural numbers something that does not come's from
Peano's axiom.
Because everything is relative you can allways multiple the amount by 2.
The more far away you are the more you have to go.
Of course, i'm not saying that N is finite in a way that there is biggest
number.
Just N->oo but not N=oo.
-- amount and bigness 1+1+1+...= infinite and finite in math today Petri Keckman
- Next message: James Pirk: "Many algebra questions"
- Previous message: Robert Vienneau: "Re: bush tax cut and small businesses"
- In reply to: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: THE THREE "LAWS OF THOUGHT""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|