Re: Natural Densities are Probabilities
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 10/13/04
- Next message: Tim Smith: "Re: Dumb arguments, and social stuff"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Natural Densities are Probabilities"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Natural Densities are Probabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:15:05 +0100
Han de Bruijn wrote:
> >> Oh yeah, what is the sum of infinitely many zero's ?
>
> > 0. This is very easy to prove: Suppose that a_j = 0 for
> > all j and let s_n = a_1 + ... + a_n. Suppose that eps > 0.
> > Let N = 1. If n > N then |0 - s_n| = 0 < eps. QED.
>
> Infinitesimals of course. I didn't mean *real* zeroes here !
So you were lying when you talked about
"infinitely many zero's" (sic). :-(
-- Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root, 88-9" Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: Tim Smith: "Re: Dumb arguments, and social stuff"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Natural Densities are Probabilities"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Natural Densities are Probabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|