Re: Religion in math.
From: Angus Rodgers (angus_prune_at_bigfoot.com)
Date: 10/14/04
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- Previous message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: Gib Bogle: "Re: Religion in math."
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: Religion in math."
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: Religion in math."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:02:53 +0100
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:24:13 +1300, Gib Bogle
<bogle@ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz> wrote:
>Yes. It is really just a bit of frivolity. Who could
>take seriously the concept of religion in mathematics,
>or mathematics in religion?
Ramanujan, for one.
-- Angus Rodgers (angus_prune@ eats spam; reply to angusrod@) Contains mild peril
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- Previous message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: Gib Bogle: "Re: Religion in math."
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: Religion in math."
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: Religion in math."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|