Re: A discovery.
From: Hibernatus (c.frings_at_laposte.net)
Date: 10/16/04
- Next message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Todd Trimble: "Re: Category of categories axiomatically"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: A discovery."
- Next in thread: Joe: "Re: A discovery."
- Reply: Joe: "Re: A discovery."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:49:57 +0200
"Joe" <jhelfand@umd.edu> a écrit dans le message news:
e62610ea.0410152017.4f1b4ffe@posting.google.com...
> > > John Schoenfeld wrote:
> > > > I discovered something of significance today.
> > >
> > > What?
> >
> > I derived an equation to generate the prime number sequence. It is O(1).
>
> Is it like the equation of Universe is U=0?
Isn't it U=17 ?
Where am I wrong ?
- Next message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Todd Trimble: "Re: Category of categories axiomatically"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: A discovery."
- Next in thread: Joe: "Re: A discovery."
- Reply: Joe: "Re: A discovery."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
