Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 10/17/04 

Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:09:10 -0300

In <39d6e584.0410161248.6946fad9@posting.google.com>, on 10/16/2004
   at 01:48 PM, troubled6man@yahoo.com (J.E.) said:

>Back to your claims that nothing else works.

Which claims? "Other approaches also work,"?

>Back to your claims that nothing else works. Have you seriously
>tried IF-logic or are you just defining past failures as proof of
>present and future failure?

There is no present failure.

>and I don't know what you mean when you say they can avoid this.

I don't say "You can avoid this." I say that there is nothing to
avoid.

>A good way to faithfully share a theory is to teach it to someone
>that you believe will make an equivalent model,

You're still confusing a theory with a model.

I've skipped the rest of you're article, but it's in the same vein;
you're rebutting what I never wrote, refusing to make critical
distinctions and failing to respond to what I actually wrote. 

-- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT  <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action.  I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.  Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do not
reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org