Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again!
From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 10/24/04
- Next message: James Dolan: "Re: Explaining e?"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B)"
- In reply to: eleaticus: "Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again!"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:02:16 GMT
"eleaticus" <eleaticus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:DYSed.194981$as2.47791@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Daryl McCullough" <daryl@atc-nycorp.com> wrote in message
> news:clgcb4026hh@drn.newsguy.com...
> > >> If a car is travelling according to x_car = 1/2 a t^2 according to
> > >> the frame of the ground, and a tree is stationary (x_tree = 0), then
> > >> what is the position of the tree as a function of time in the frame
> > >> of the car?
> >
> > What's the answer?
>
> For the umpteenth time:
>
> The answer is that this whole (sub)thread is about the relationship of
three
> points stationary with respect to an inertial system and in line at equal
> intervals. It is easily demonstrable by all but idiots that the
transformed
> location vectors of the three points satisfy B'-A'=C'-B', proving that
even
> in the accelerated system the three points are indeed always in a straight
> line and thus the the moving object moved in a stright line and did so in
> such a way that the two equal distances, B'-A' and C'-B' were traversed in
> equal times, proving it was neither accelerated nor 'curved' in its
passage.
What can you say except what Dirk has on his site: 'Sucking Logic, Sucking
Algebra, Sucking Attitude, Sucking Thumbs, the deadly combination of
IGNORANCE and ARROGANCE.'
Bill
>
> Thanks for your inquiry, too-dumb-and-corrupt-to-be-real McCullough
>
> Since you weren't born that dumb, perhaps your momma dropped you on your
> head too often. Or is the problem your True Believer cultism?
>
> eleaticus
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Daryl McCullough
> > Ithaca, NY
> >
>
>
- Next message: James Dolan: "Re: Explaining e?"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B)"
- In reply to: eleaticus: "Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again!"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|