Re: Perfect set proof
From: Robert Israel (israel_at_math.ubc.ca)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Nick Funnels: "Re: roots of polynomials that contain phi"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: how to calculate the nearest neighbor within a square?"
- In reply to: Agapito Martinez: "Re: Perfect set proof"
- Next in thread: Agapito Martinez: "Re: Perfect set proof"
- Reply: Agapito Martinez: "Re: Perfect set proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Oct 2004 17:41:17 GMT
In article <d2b49620.0410280738.5bdb304b@posting.google.com>,
Agapito Martinez <agapito6314@aol.com> wrote:
>> "Agapito Martinez" <agapito6314@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:d2b49620.0410260726.ddccdf2@posting.google.com...
>> >P is a perfect subset of R^n. A perfect set (Rudin) is one all of
>> > whose points are limit points, and which contains all its limit
>> > points.
>> > There exists an (open) neighborhood V in R^n so that P intersect V is
>> > not empty. If W is a subset of V and also a neighborhood in R^n, how
>> > does one show that P intersect W is not empty?
>Of course, I asked the wrong question. The question is how does one
>show that there exists a subset of V, name it W, which is also a
>neighborhood in R^n, such that P intersect W is not empty. Thanks.
What about W = V?
Maybe this was also the wrong question.
Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Next message: Nick Funnels: "Re: roots of polynomials that contain phi"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: how to calculate the nearest neighbor within a square?"
- In reply to: Agapito Martinez: "Re: Perfect set proof"
- Next in thread: Agapito Martinez: "Re: Perfect set proof"
- Reply: Agapito Martinez: "Re: Perfect set proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|