Re: Infinity is not that big!
From: HERC777 (herc777_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Rod: "Re: asking suggestions on the algorithm in compution.Thanks."
- Previous message: kalikinkar: "Re: 6"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Oct 2004 01:12:08 -0700
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in
> HERC777 wrote:
>
> >
> > 0 is not a natural number
> > 0 has no magnitude
>
> 0 is the identity element of the additive group of rational integers
> (i.e. 0, positive integers and negative integers). So one cannot say 0
> is nothing.
> >
> > if infinity was a number then oo = 0
>
> 0 is a number. oo is not a number in the algebraic sense.
>
> Bob Kolker
The intention here is that "infinty is BIG" "Bigger than anything else" is
misleading. Its more like just 'bigger', no size of its own.
Of the natural numbers 1 2 3 4 5 ..
0 is left and oo is right, they don't really count.
Herc
- Next message: Rod: "Re: asking suggestions on the algorithm in compution.Thanks."
- Previous message: kalikinkar: "Re: 6"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading