Re: sci.math.moderated?
From: Van Jacques (vanjac12_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: Tim Brauch: "Re: Smart the Schizo (was 0.9999 =/= 1)"
- Previous message: Mensanator: "Re: 6"
- In reply to: Wayne Brown: "Re: sci.math.moderated?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Oct 2004 21:57:35 -0700
Wayne Brown wrote:
> Rex Butler <RexButler@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > What is stopping the creation of sci.math.moderated? The lack of
moderators?
>
> No, it's the lack of anyone willing to go through the (rather
lengthy)
> process involved in creating a new moderated group in the sci.*
hierarchy.
> Presumably no one has wanted it enough to put in the necessary
effort.
>
> --
> Wayne Brown (HPCC #1104) | "When your tail's in a crack, you
improvise
> fwbrown@bellsouth.net | if you're good enough. Otherwise you
give
> | your pelt to the trapper."
> "e^(i*pi) = -1" -- Euler | -- John Myers Myers,
"Silverlock"
Also, if you use a newsreader, there are a few people you could
killfile,
and the # of annoying posts would be manageable.
Van
- Next message: Tim Brauch: "Re: Smart the Schizo (was 0.9999 =/= 1)"
- Previous message: Mensanator: "Re: 6"
- In reply to: Wayne Brown: "Re: sci.math.moderated?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|