Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe.
From: Lefty (Ye_at_h.Right)
Date: 10/31/04
- Next message: Neil L.: "Is this a legitimate proof by induction?"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe."
- Next in thread: Ted Night: "Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:45:45 GMT
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:2uiqktF2bg21aU2@uni-berlin.de...
>
>
> Lefty wrote:
>
> >
> > Can you show me how the proof is flawed ?
>
> The proof is wonderful. It just doesn't mean ***.
>
> Science is based on grouping together distinct objects with common
> properties and predicting on the basis of common properties. Treating
> everything as unique would make scientific generalization impossible.
>
> Bob Kolker
Bob -
My prediction of your properties could be based upon
http://www.xs4all.nl/~marcone/sciphysics.html
Now, I have given you the benefit of the doubt temporarily, but if I dont
see any math coming from you, you will surely be killfiled with your very
next post. End of story. Disprove it via counterexample or whatever, but I
will not dignify half-assed destructive criticisms.
- Next message: Neil L.: "Is this a legitimate proof by induction?"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe."
- Next in thread: Ted Night: "Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]