Re: Embedding Boolean Algebras
From: Noel Vaillant (vaillant_at_probability.net)
Date: 10/31/04
- Next message: Garry Denke: "Re: .99999=1 explanation"
- Previous message: Glenn Knickerbocker: "Re: Longest Thread Ever"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "Re: Embedding Boolean Algebras"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Embedding Boolean Algebras"
- Reply: William Elliot: "Embedding Boolean Algebras"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:51:41 GMT
> > This applies in particular to Boolean algebras (which are just
> > commutative rings in which every element is idempotent, i.e. a^2=a)
>
> Itdoesnot,Booleanalgebrashave a + a = a.
Sure, we have a \/ a = a , but if you define:
a+b = a'b \/ ab'
Then (B,+, /\) is a commutative ring (with unit) in which every element is
idempotent. Hence Krull's theorem applies.
Every Boolean algebra has a maximal (proper) ideal.
- Next message: Garry Denke: "Re: .99999=1 explanation"
- Previous message: Glenn Knickerbocker: "Re: Longest Thread Ever"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "Re: Embedding Boolean Algebras"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Embedding Boolean Algebras"
- Reply: William Elliot: "Embedding Boolean Algebras"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]