Re: DES and 3DES
From: Jack D. Ripper (JDRipper_at_spitalfields.net)
Date: 11/03/04
- Next message: GE: "Equivalent sequences"
- Previous message: Van Jacques: "Re: Simple group of order 60"
- In reply to: postminimalist: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- Next in thread: Max Mustermann: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- Reply: Max Mustermann: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 22:40:06 GMT
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 19:09:21 +0000, postminimalist wrote:
> mjc wrote:
>
>>
>> I prefer quadruple rot-13.
>
> not that 3DES and AES are much better. silly newbs think consumer-grade
> ciphers are secure.
Really? Are we to understand that you are in possession of some efficient
technique to break them, or know of somebody who does? Or are you just an
armchair expert?
- Next message: GE: "Equivalent sequences"
- Previous message: Van Jacques: "Re: Simple group of order 60"
- In reply to: postminimalist: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- Next in thread: Max Mustermann: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- Reply: Max Mustermann: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
