Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)
From: Han de Bruijn (Han.deBruijn_at_DTO.TUDelft.NL)
Date: 11/04/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- In reply to: Daniel Grubb: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:26:18 +0100
Daniel Grubb wrote:
> [ ... ] I'd say that you should stick with the last 3 of your links.
>
> --Dan Grubb
Thank you very much, Dan!
Han de Bruijn
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: DES and 3DES"
- In reply to: Daniel Grubb: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|