Re: Uniqueness of physical objects in the universe.

From: Lefty (Ye_at_h.Right)
Date: 11/06/04 

Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 23:12:17 GMT

"Tron99" <drstrangeglove99@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5751a31e.0411061351.4debc449@posting.google.com...
> >
> > Was Hilbert talking about spacetime, or R3 ? I must research this
further.
> > Maybe an interlibrary loan - not much on the internet surprisingly,
except
> > in sci.math.
> >
> http://www.math.uncc.edu/~droyster/math3181/notes/hyprgeom/node1.html
>
> scroll down to incidence axioms. this type of geometry can be
> searched under "neutral geometry".

I have to ask you for your opinion. I have a moderate background in math and
less in physics, but I dont do it for a living, and so I may not be aware of
all the kookery and crackpot ideas which have been debunked for the past few
centuries.

I just need an opinion - uniqueness of physical objects - crackpot idea ?

On a scale of 0 to 10, "0" being not a crackpot at all, and "10" being
completely wacky crackpot material, what do you think ?

5 ?

Relevant Pages