Re: Analysis problem, need some help here...
From: José Carlos Santos (jcsantos_at_fc.up.pt)
Date: 11/08/04
- Next message: John Baez: "This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 208)"
- Previous message: N. Silver: "Re: Two children paradox"
- In reply to: damsel-in-distress: "Re: Analysis problem, need some help here..."
- Next in thread: Justin Young: "RE: Analysis problem, need some help here..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:24:40 +0000
damsel-in-distress wrote:
> So you are using the proof of contradiction, but how does the fact
> that (a_n)_n has some convergent subsequence contradict anything,
> so as to make the initial hypothesis false? I can be a lil slow at
> times.. :)
First of all, two things:
1) Please don't top-post. If you want to know what's that and why you
shouldn't do it, read
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
or
http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?toppost
for instance.
2) While writing, please press the ENTER key once in a while.
Now, concerning your specific question: let (b_n)_n be a convergent
subsequence of (a_n)_n and let l = lim_n b_n. Then l belongs to [a,b]
and lim_n f(b_n) = inf f = 0. But, since f is continuous at l, you
have f(l) = f(lim_n b_n) = lim_n f(b_n) = 0, which is impossible.
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
- Next message: John Baez: "This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 208)"
- Previous message: N. Silver: "Re: Two children paradox"
- In reply to: damsel-in-distress: "Re: Analysis problem, need some help here..."
- Next in thread: Justin Young: "RE: Analysis problem, need some help here..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]