Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: Christer Ericson: "Re: 142857"
- Previous message: Steve Liem \(Ritzi Lee\): "Tricky group theory question"
- In reply to: J.E.: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:50:41 +0100
"J.E." <troubled6man@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:39d6e584.0411091744.7f3ad4e7@posting.google.com...
> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<4190b334$0$16556$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>...
[snip]
> > But do try to enjoy it - and make good use of the practice you
> > get to educate the other idiots you will be meeting here soon :-)
> >
> > Dirk Vdm
>
> I already thanked you for trying to be helpful, so this time I'll
> thank you for your politeness towards myself. I did look over quite
> of few of the posts you mentioned, and I didn't see anyone else stick
> to observables in the parts that were quoted. I could study the
> context of every quote, but that'd be fairly exhausting, and I'm not
> sure exactly what the reward would be.
>
> Androcles does seem to stick to guns when he can find any that appear
> to him to be actual guns, he even admits to many (though not all) of
> the logical consequences of his theory, like having images smeared
> out. But whether Androcles has enough free variables to massage any
> data into supporting his theory is independant of how SR can be tested
> and how to show if it passes or not, because multiple models CAN fit
> the same data.
>
> Androcles can announce that his model fits the data as much as he
> wants, and it doesn't affect SR. But if he wants to discuss SR, then
> that does affect SR, and I've noted too many physicsists using vague
> unobservable terms like contraction and dilation and simultaneous
> which are almost always silly at best for educational purposes. I
> agree that a gamma factor makes it easy to predict where a muon is
> supposed to die, and handy if you know what you are doing, but I think
> Androcles is sincere, and look what such terms do to his brain?
Androcles sincere?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: Christer Ericson: "Re: 142857"
- Previous message: Steve Liem \(Ritzi Lee\): "Tricky group theory question"
- In reply to: J.E.: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|