Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results
From: George Kahrimanis (anakreon_at_hol.gr)
Date: 11/13/04
- Next message: lucy: "stat problem: how to design a voting mechanism to vote publicly?"
- Previous message: Chas Brown: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- In reply to: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Reply: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:50:36 +0200 To: Rich.Ulrich@comcast.net
I do share the scare but I want to point out that
adding a dubious argument to a case (like the apparent discrepacy
between affiliation registration and voting) only weakens the case.
Besides, if one finds fault with procedures that he had
accepted initially, he seems to deserve what he 's got
(whether ineptitude or duplicity may be suspected).
Therefore only two kinds of cases are sustainable now, imo:
(1) if someone (like Jimmy Carter) has insisted since before
the elections that they did not seem free and fair, and
(2) if after the election some new fact is learned, like
the grossly inefficient encryption scheme that has been described
in another message.
~ George Kahrimanis
- Next message: lucy: "stat problem: how to design a voting mechanism to vote publicly?"
- Previous message: Chas Brown: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- In reply to: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Reply: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
