Re: " Wouldn't we agree with a mathematical writing ?

From: William Elliot (marsh_at_privacy.net)
Date: 11/14/04 

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 23:21:25 -0800

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Norm Dresner wrote:
> "William Elliot" <marsh@privacy.net> wrote in message
> > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Alain Verghote wrote:
> > >
> > > Why not keeping things simple whenever possible.
> > > I do believe that rspect of a few conventions makes the reading
> > > more direct and easy.
> >
> > Yes such as the old fashion conventions for readablity of equations with a
> > space on both sides of the equality sign and all but the very shortest on
> > a single line. However in view of the modern faster is better fad of
> > writing equations with no spaces at all, I propose we revert to the
> > ancient Sanskrit example of writhingwithnospacesatall.
> >
> > Thatwaytherewouldbeuniformityinhowallstuffiswritten.
> > Inallwe'dsavemillionsofnanosecondsnotwrittingspaces.
> >
>
> We could always go approximately half-way in time-savings and adopt the
> Hebrew convention that vowels are not written, only consonants.
> Tht wy thr wld b nfrmty n hw ll stff s wrttn
> n ll w'd sv mllns f nnscnds nt wrttng spcs.
>
> Take you choice.
>
Ltssbth

Quantcast