Re: A fairly simple proposition
From: Doug Goncz (dgoncz_at_aol.com)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Tim: "Re: Infinite square roots problem - I can't solve it!"
- Previous message: Arnold Neumaier: "Re: Lyapunov stability"
- In reply to: Saint Cad: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Next in thread: José Carlos Santos: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Reply: José Carlos Santos: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Reply: I.M.Davidson: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Reply: Doug Goncz : "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Nov 2004 13:20:48 GMT
Well, I recall something like if gcd(a,b,c)=1 then gcd(a+b, c-a, c-b)=1...
A counterexample woudl certainly be useful, but I'd like to hear some theory.
It's really pretty bare. Just the two conditions gcd(a,b,c)=1 and a<b<c<(a+b)
do produce c-a !== 0 (mod b) OR c-b !== 0 in my searches to c=101. But why
would that be? I haven't found a counterexample.
What's the symbol for OR? V? or \/?
Restating:
Given
0<a,b,c
a<b<c<(a+b)
gcd(a,b,c)=1
Proposition:
c-a !== 0 (mod b) \/ c-b !== 0 (mod a)
Proposition true? Counterexample? Discussion?
An alternative proposition,
a+b !== 0 (mod c) \/ c-a !== 0 (mod b) \/ c-b !== 0 (mod a)
might be true if the proposition I have made is not.
Doug Goncz
I love: Dona, Jeff, Kim, Kimmie, Mom, Neelix, Tasha, and Teri, alphabetically.
I drive: A double-step Thunderbolt with 657% range.
I fight terrorism by: Using less gasoline.
- Next message: Tim: "Re: Infinite square roots problem - I can't solve it!"
- Previous message: Arnold Neumaier: "Re: Lyapunov stability"
- In reply to: Saint Cad: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Next in thread: José Carlos Santos: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Reply: José Carlos Santos: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Reply: I.M.Davidson: "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Reply: Doug Goncz : "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]