Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?
From: Jon Haugsand (jonhaug_at_ifi.uio.no)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Previous message: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: Curt Welch: "Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Nov 2004 19:17:38 +0100
* Curt Welch
> Nath is not something I specialize in (and I don't read this group
> normally),
Obviously.
> but I've been looking at a few things lately and I've decided
> that some very big mistakes have been made in math because people started
> playing around the concept of infinity without realizing the trouble they
> were creating for themselves.
Don't you find just a tiny piece of pathetic arrogance here?
-- Jon Haugsand Dept. of Informatics, Univ. of Oslo, Norway, mailto:jonhaug@ifi.uio.no http://www.ifi.uio.no/~jonhaug/, Phone: +47 22 85 24 92
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: A fairly simple proposition"
- Previous message: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: Curt Welch: "Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]