Re: JSH has gotten a lot clearer
From: James Harris (jstevh_at_msn.com)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Perky People Prefer Pure Pseudorandom Periodicity"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: Perky People Prefer Pure Pseudorandom Periodicity"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: JSH has gotten a lot clearer"
- Next in thread: Dik T. Winter: "Re: JSH has gotten a lot clearer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Nov 2004 03:37:41 -0800
Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> wrote in message news:<KFVld.17093$Gm6.15495@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> In article <cn8gu7$2hfu$1@agate.berkeley.edu>, Arturo Magidin wrote:
> >> The exposition is a *lot* clearer now.
> >
> > It would be hard to make it less clear, but I do not think it is
> > particularly clear here. For example, do you think "which allows a
> > factorization into non-polynomial factors" is particularly clear?
>
> I said "clearer", not "clear". Before, when I tried to read it, I got lost
> after about two sentences, thinking "what the heck are all these variables
> that are coming out of nowhere...is this supposed to be a polymonial in x,
> or in m, or what?". Compared to that, it is a lot clearer. :-)
Notice how you reacted to their criticism.
The people replying to you have done this for YEARS and every time
anyone comes out to say that they kind of understand what I'm saying,
they get attacked.
And just like you, they usually capitulate.
In fact I *did* step through my argument with just a single variable
some time ago, and got a lot of weird garbage from posters who just
disagree with me, no matter what.
It's like they're part of some weird cult. They track me endlessly.
Put up webpages, and spend a lot of time trying to convince other
people I have nothing worth paying attention to, while they spend so
much time and effort paying attention.
It's one of the weirdest and most annoying behaviors I've come across
and these people aren't harmless, like with that email attack they
mounted against my paper, where the editors were beaten down IN A DAY
and withdrew my paper:
http://www.emis.de/journals/SWJPAM/vol2-03.html
I'm hoping some of you will get a clue: Those posters are here to beat
you down if you dare to try and figure out as well as explain what I'm
saying.
Why do you think at times in frustration I've called you people sheep
and cows?
I mean, just look at how easily you fold when one of the dark cabal
jumps on your posts!
It's like no one on the newsgroup has any backbone.
James Harris
http://mathforprofit.blogspot.com/
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Perky People Prefer Pure Pseudorandom Periodicity"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: Perky People Prefer Pure Pseudorandom Periodicity"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: JSH has gotten a lot clearer"
- Next in thread: Dik T. Winter: "Re: JSH has gotten a lot clearer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|