Re: .99999... still=/= 1
From: Richard Tobin (richard_at_cogsci.ed.ac.uk)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Previous message: Doug Goncz : "Counterexample to t( (c^n - a^n) mod b ) | phi(b)"
- In reply to: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Next in thread: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Reply: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Nov 2004 17:13:38 GMT
In article <20041117120427.21787.00000684@mb-m12.aol.com>,
S. Enterprize Company <smart1234@aol.com> wrote:
>1 - .9 = .1
>.1 - .09 = .01
>.01 - .009 = .001
>.....
>.0...1 - .00...9 = .00...1
>
> You are still not reaching 0.
Nor are you reaching .999...
-- Richard
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- Previous message: Doug Goncz : "Counterexample to t( (c^n - a^n) mod b ) | phi(b)"
- In reply to: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Next in thread: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Reply: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
