Re: pi + e
From: Dave Rusin (rusin_at_vesuvius.math.niu.edu)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: new twist to the Crossover Technique of the VonNeumann Gametheory in playing StockMarket; BCE, SBC, drug companies"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- In reply to: Robin Chapman: "Re: pi + e"
- Next in thread: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: pi + e"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Nov 2004 17:29:55 GMT
In article <cnfk89$f7d$1@south.jnrs.ja.net>,
Robin Chapman <rjc@ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> Because I misunderstood what "pi e" meant -- I hadn't realized until
>> reading another answer that you meant the _product_ of the two quantities,
>> which is
>> usually designated as pi x e or pi * e or pi . e or ...
>
>No, it's usually designated as pi e.
In the mail I get that means something else...
Subject: B,uy SECRET Appl;e pi e rec1pes NOW!!! to en'larg,e you're ...
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: new twist to the Crossover Technique of the VonNeumann Gametheory in playing StockMarket; BCE, SBC, drug companies"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- In reply to: Robin Chapman: "Re: pi + e"
- Next in thread: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: pi + e"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]