(Possibly) New model of compution
From: FunnyGuy (mrjwalton_at_cogeco.caDONOTSPAM)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Tapio: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Porky Pig Jr: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Reply: Porky Pig Jr: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Reply: Tim Mellor: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:51:52 -0500
I apologise to those who read yesterdays post of the same topic. Turns out
that my article was yanked because they don't want to see any incomplete
rough sketches posted to their repository (so they said).
Anyway, again I was interested in feedback and wondered if it was a new
idea or not, or even if other people thought it was interesting and worth
polishing into a completed paper.
Anyway, I've now put it up on the following webpage:
http://home.cogeco.ca/~walton60/tree.pdf
So check it out and comment in this thread.
- Next message: Tapio: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Porky Pig Jr: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Reply: Porky Pig Jr: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Reply: Tim Mellor: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|