Re: (Possibly) New model of compution
From: Porky Pig Jr (porky_pig_jr_at_my-deja.com)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: Michael Lockhart: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: asking suggestions on the algorithm in compution.Thanks."
- In reply to: FunnyGuy: "(Possibly) New model of compution"
- Next in thread: FunnyGuy: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Reply: FunnyGuy: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Nov 2004 19:46:46 -0800
FunnyGuy <mrjwalton@cogeco.caDONOTSPAM> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.11.18.17.51.51.233782@cogeco.caDONOTSPAM>...
> I apologise to those who read yesterdays post of the same topic. Turns out
> that my article was yanked because they don't want to see any incomplete
> rough sketches posted to their repository (so they said).
>
> Anyway, again I was interested in feedback and wondered if it was a new
> idea or not, or even if other people thought it was interesting and worth
> polishing into a completed paper.
>
> Anyway, I've now put it up on the following webpage:
>
> http://home.cogeco.ca/~walton60/tree.pdf
>
> So check it out and comment in this thread.
first, tell us what is the 'old model of compution'. what is
'compution' anyway? sound like a shorthand for 'computer pollution' to
me.
- Next message: Michael Lockhart: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: asking suggestions on the algorithm in compution.Thanks."
- In reply to: FunnyGuy: "(Possibly) New model of compution"
- Next in thread: FunnyGuy: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Reply: FunnyGuy: "Re: (Possibly) New model of compution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
