Re: Why are reals uncountable yet algorithms countable (long)?
From: seratend (ser_monmail_at_yahoo.fr)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: Eric Gisse: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Previous message: eleaticus: "SR consistency is crap."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Why are reals uncountable yet algorithms countable (long)?"
- Next in thread: Ron Sperber: "Re: Why are reals uncountable yet algorithms countable (long)?"
- Reply: Ron Sperber: "Re: Why are reals uncountable yet algorithms countable (long)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Nov 2004 02:12:20 -0800
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:<2vs5a8F2nf0jrU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Ray Whitmer wrote:
> >
Quick simple question, is |Nx|N isomorphic to |R?
Seratend.
- Next message: Eric Gisse: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Previous message: eleaticus: "SR consistency is crap."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Why are reals uncountable yet algorithms countable (long)?"
- Next in thread: Ron Sperber: "Re: Why are reals uncountable yet algorithms countable (long)?"
- Reply: Ron Sperber: "Re: Why are reals uncountable yet algorithms countable (long)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
