Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: funtion notation"
- Previous message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Counterexample to t( (c^n - a^n) mod b ) | phi(b)"
- In reply to: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Nov 2004 14:07:40 +0200
curt@kcwc.com (Curt Welch) writes:
> .2 represents the results of dividing 1 by 5.
???
1/5 represents the result of dividing 1 by 5.
.2 represents the result of multiplying 2 by one tenth.
Phil
-- ... one Marine noticed one of the prisoners was still breathing. A Marine can be heard saying on the pool footage provided to Reuters Television: "He's fucking faking he's dead. He faking he's fucking dead." "The Marine then raises his rifle and fires into the man's head. The pictures are too graphic for us to broadcast," Sites said.
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: funtion notation"
- Previous message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Counterexample to t( (c^n - a^n) mod b ) | phi(b)"
- In reply to: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]