Re: Set Theory
From: fishfry (BLOCKSPAMfishfry_at_your-mailbox.com)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: JEMebius: "Re: Finding unique sums. - Super-increasing sequences and knapsack problems"
- Previous message: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: Steven: "Set Theory"
- Next in thread: Steven: "Re: Set Theory"
- Reply: Steven: "Re: Set Theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:12:08 GMT
In article <W2Pnd.4251$c21.1773@news02.roc.ny>,
"Steven" <sgottlieb60@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone please get me started with proving 2^ aleph null = c? This is
> not HW but rather self study.
Consider all the real numbers between 0 and 1, represented in binary
notation. For example .0001110100101010100... would be one such.
Number the positions starting from the radix point 0, 1, 2, 3, 4.
That's enough of a hint.
- Next message: JEMebius: "Re: Finding unique sums. - Super-increasing sequences and knapsack problems"
- Previous message: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: Steven: "Set Theory"
- Next in thread: Steven: "Re: Set Theory"
- Reply: Steven: "Re: Set Theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]