Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)
From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: KK: "Re: Confused about DFT and Fourier Series and Fourier Transform?"
- Previous message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: David Longley: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "[OT]: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:45:21 +0000 (UTC)
"David Longley" <David@longley.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> And there's an illustrative example of why it's
> false. Most people, at any age, don't take
> criticism well (if at all), and very very few
> actively seek it out even when it's in their own
> best interests to do so. It's an essential skill
> of the professional to court criticism. It's the
> sine qua non for learning.
Now compare and contrast this statement which you
profess to believe, with your utter incapability to
understand what "dozens if not hundreds" of people
are telling you when they say that your ravings are
misplaced in comp.ai.philosophy, a newsgroup which
has precisely no charter admitting discussions of
Skinnerian behaviorism, and draw what conclusions
your broken thinking processes can accomplish for
you using only that information.
A modification of your behavior would be most
welcome, but least expected, as the outcome of such
introspection.
HTH
xanthian.
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: KK: "Re: Confused about DFT and Fourier Series and Fourier Transform?"
- Previous message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: David Longley: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "[OT]: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|