Re: is SVD decomposition unique?
From: Zdislav V. Kovarik (kovarik_at_mcmaster.ca)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: JXStern: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: The Paradox of Zeno"
- In reply to: lucy: "is SVD decomposition unique?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:50:45 -0500
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, lucy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering if SVD decomposition is unique or not... given a matrix A,
> can it be composed into two different SVD forms:
>
> A=U1*S1*V1'=U2*S2*V2'
>
> ???
Re-think the question from your follow-up inquiry (about similarity): what
are your assumptions?
To the present question: Have you experimented? Look at the 1-by-1 matrix
[-2]: two of its SVD's (real scalars assumed) are
[1]*[2]*[-1] and [-1]*[2]*[1]
And in higher dimensions, the variety will increase.
Next experiment: How many SVD's does the 2-by-2 identity matrix have?
And if you feel "cheated" by the simplicity of the previous examples,
consider all the SVD's of an orthogonal matrix.
Cheers, ZVK(Slavek).
- Next message: JXStern: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: The Paradox of Zeno"
- In reply to: lucy: "is SVD decomposition unique?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]