Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?

From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 11/21/04


Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:45:10 -0500


Curt Welch wrote:

> Dave Seaman <dseaman@no.such.host> wrote:
>
>
>>Do you agree that |N| < |P(N)|?
>
>
> For finite sets, it's obvious that the size of N is < size of the P(N).
>
> For infinite sets, the question seems to me to be invalid to ask.
>
> It's exactly like the following word problem: If we built one machine to
> count to infinity which can count one number per second, and a second
> machine which can count at the speed 2^T numbers per second, where T is how
> long the machines have been running, which machine will finish first?

Constructability is not a requirement for theorizing about power sets.

The way you deal with infinite sets is to use a static definition. A set
is infinite if and only if there exists an injective surjection of the
the set to a proper subset of itself. We know the set of integers is
infinite because the correspondence n <-> 2*n is just such an injective
surjection of the integers onto the even integers.

Bob Kolker



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantor and the binary tree
    ... > Of finite sets (which are the only thing we meet directly in the Real ... and must therefore include an "infinite set" of number names ... inherent in different representations for the same set and equivalent ... This simply isn't what mathematics is about. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability
    ... us the naturals, and from them the other number systems on which TO is ... One can compare sets over a finite domain, or an infinite domain. ... The invertible functions of IFR map reals to reals. ... TO is always going on about what is true for finite sets must ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Inconsistent sets
    ... >Martin Shobe wrote: ... >>>case of finite sets, I agree. ... >> both finite and infinite sets. ... >The notion of relative cardinality leads to the theorem that there are ...
    (sci.math)
  • Nay Second Order
    ... The power set of a set with n elements has simply ... has a trivial model of finite sets. ... is infinite. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z
    ... > that we claim changes between infinite and finite sets is how mapping works, ... We agree that the finite/infinite distinction is a distinction ... bijective correspondence as a notion of number of elements is, ...
    (sci.math)