Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?
From: Han de Bruijn (Han.deBruijn_at_DTO.TUDelft.NL)
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Maybe in reply to: fishfry: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:54:40 +0100
*** T. Winter wrote:
> Indeed, what I wrote is incorrect. Correction: the triangle
> inequality does not hold in a floating-point model of the
> real numbers.
That is correct. And I wasn't aware of it.
Thank you for pointing this out.
Han de Bruijn
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Maybe in reply to: fishfry: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]