Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation
From: Eray Ozkural exa (examachine_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: David Petry: "Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Previous message: Dave Langers: "Re: dif(f(x), x) = dif(x, f^-1(x))"
- In reply to: Stephen Harris: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Nov 2004 12:08:48 -0800
"Stephen Harris" <cyberguard1048-usenet@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<zegod.48477$QJ3.39747@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>...
> "JXStern" <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote in message
> news:v3n2q0tp4d3pelduh327ncs8tnflfdr7gl@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 01:48:39 GMT, "Stephen Harris"
> > <cyberguard1048-usenet@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> I'm a big fan of SEP, but I believe the idealist interpretation they
> >>> give Turing machines in several articles is inconsistent with what
> >>> Turing wrote, and inconsistent with what he wrote about.
> >>
> >>I'm not sure what SEP stands for.
> >
> > The Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy that you gave several URLs
> > from.
> >
> > J.
> >
>
> http://www.alanturing.net/turing_archive/pages/Reference%20Articles/What%20is%20a%20Turing%20Machine.html#head
> by B.J. (Jack) Copeland
>
> "Commercially available computers are hard-wired to perform primitive
> operations considerably more sophisticated than those of a Turing machine
> --add, multiply, decrement, store-at-address, branch, and so forth. The
> precise constitution of the list of primitives varies from manufacturer to
> manufacturer. It is a remarkable fact that none of these computers can outdo
> a Turing machine. Despite the Turing machine's austere simplicity, it is
> capable of computing anything that any computer on the market can compute.
>
> Indeed, since it is an abstract or notional machine, a Turing machine can
> compute more than any physical computer. This is because
...
On the brakes! You're going off-track again.
Cheers,
-- Eray
- Next message: David Petry: "Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Previous message: Dave Langers: "Re: dif(f(x), x) = dif(x, f^-1(x))"
- In reply to: Stephen Harris: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|