Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism
From: Daryl McCullough (daryl_at_atc-nycorp.com)
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: herc777_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- In reply to: David Petry: "Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Next in thread: herc777_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Reply: herc777_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Nov 2004 13:02:56 -0800
David Petry says...
>
>Cantor's theory (classical set theory) has the same relationship to
>the mathematical sciences as Creationism theory has to the physical
>sciences.
Actually, no.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: herc777_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- In reply to: David Petry: "Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Next in thread: herc777_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Reply: herc777_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading