Re: Is this math test too easy?
From: Richard Henry (rphenry_at_home.com)
Date: 11/23/04
- Next message: Richard Henry: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Previous message: John Savard: "Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:14:00 -0800
"Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:93k5q0p7es1dpbt7e2upljfods2gdp723r@4ax.com...
> Herman Rubin writes:
>
> > One cannot do critical thinking to any real extent without
> > mathematics.
>
> I've been doing critical thinking all my life, and exposure to
> mathematics was not necessary to make it possible, nor did it enhance my
> ability to do it to any extent.
Are your contributions to this thread examples of your critical thinking?
>
> > To do so, one needs to be able to at least
> > attempt to evaluate ALL the "major" consequences of one's
> > actions, and this requires stating them precisely, which is
> > mathematical formulation.
>
> There are many ways to accomplish this without mathematics. And
> mathematics isn't that precise.
Please provide an example of a discipline more precise.
- Next message: Richard Henry: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Previous message: John Savard: "Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|