Re: Is this math test too easy?
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/23/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- In reply to: Herman Rubin: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:18:24 +0100
Herman Rubin writes:
> Who doesn't need it?
Almost anyone who _isn't_ a physics or engineering student, which covers
most of the population.
> I agree about the useless, irrelevant material. So get rid of
> that.
That's what I've been advocating.
> At this time, probability and statistics has become higher
> mathematics.
Most of it, yes.
> However, any intelligent decision making under
> uncertainty requires these, and not the current teaching of
> computational methodology.
It doesn't require any formal training in probability or statistics.
Even a grade-school understanding is sufficient. Indeed, even an
intuitive understanding may suffice.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- In reply to: Herman Rubin: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: Is this math test too easy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]