are these stabability conditions the same?
From: kiki (lunaliu3_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: Is zero even or odd?"
- Previous message: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: Gauss-Seidel vs Jacobi iteration method"
- Next in thread: Randy Yates: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Reply: Randy Yates: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Reply: Tim Wescott: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Maybe reply: Tim Wescott: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:16:06 -0800
Hi all,
I understood the two stability conditions:
One is BIBO criteria in Fourier analysis... it says that if the impulse
response is not absolute integrable, i.e. if Integrate(|h(t)|, t from -inf
to inf)=inf then the system is not BIBO stable...
>From this criteria, an ideal low pass filter is not BIBO stable, since its
impulse response is "sinc" function, which can be proved to have
Integrate(|sinc(t)|, t from -inf to inf)=inf...
Another criteria is the negative real part of the poles criteria in Laplace
analysis, which says that for a system to be stable, its poles should have
negative real parts...(on the left plane on the complex s-domain)...
According to this criteria, the Laplace transform of the impulse function
sinc(t) is:
-----------------------------------------------
>> syms t s
>> laplace(sin(pi*t)/(pi*t))
ans =
1/pi*atan(pi/s)
-----------------------------------------------
But it has no pole at all... so sinc(t) is a stable system according to this
Laplace analysis.
Isn't this strange? Did I miss anything?
Can anybody throw me some lights? And talk something about the relationships
of these various conditions for stabality systems?
Thanks a lot
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: Is zero even or odd?"
- Previous message: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: "Re: Gauss-Seidel vs Jacobi iteration method"
- Next in thread: Randy Yates: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Reply: Randy Yates: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Reply: Tim Wescott: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Maybe reply: Tim Wescott: "Re: are these stabability conditions the same?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|