Re: multiple.....
From: José Carlos Santos (jcsantos_at_fc.up.pt)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: Gactimus: "Re: [OT] I hate being American"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The state-of-the-art in mathematics"
- In reply to: mina_world: "Re: multiple....."
- Next in thread: Ron Sperber: "Re: multiple....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:06:17 +0000
On 30-12-2004 15:26, mina_world wrote:
>>>a,b,c,d,u is integers.
>>>
>>>if ac, bc+ad, bd is multiple of u,
>>>then bc, ad is multiple of u.
>>
>>This is not true. Take a = c = 2, b = d = 1, and u = 4.
>>
> but bd=1 is not multiple of u=4.
Sorry, I've missed that bd should also be a multiple of u.
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
- Next message: Gactimus: "Re: [OT] I hate being American"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The state-of-the-art in mathematics"
- In reply to: mina_world: "Re: multiple....."
- Next in thread: Ron Sperber: "Re: multiple....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]