Re: naive questions regarding isometries
From: Sean McIlroy (sean_mcilroy_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: lucy: "Re: Is absolute integral really the neccessary and sufficient condition for a system to be stable?"
- Previous message: lasse_rempe_at_yahoo.de: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- In reply to: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: naive questions regarding isometries"
- Next in thread: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: naive questions regarding isometries"
- Reply: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: naive questions regarding isometries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Nov 2004 00:11:05 -0800
> A mirror image switches the "handedness" of a figure, but doing it a second
> time switches it back.
So: Figures have a certain property with two possible values, and two
figures have different values for that property if one can be obtained
by reflecting the other. I was hoping for something a little more
informative, in particular some kind of proof.
> >*) What conditions determine whether a two dimensional figure can be
> >rotated and translated back to itself after being subjected to a
> >reflection?
> ... the figure would
> need to be bilaterally symetric (congruent with at least one reflection of
> itself).
So: After being reflected, the figure can be rotated and translated
back to itself if it's congruent with its reflection. Also not as
informative as I was hoping for.
- Next message: lucy: "Re: Is absolute integral really the neccessary and sufficient condition for a system to be stable?"
- Previous message: lasse_rempe_at_yahoo.de: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- In reply to: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: naive questions regarding isometries"
- Next in thread: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: naive questions regarding isometries"
- Reply: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: naive questions regarding isometries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]