Re: Ring of continuous real functions
From: William Elliot (marsh_at_privacy.net)
Date: 11/25/04
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Quantum Gravity Hypothesis"
- Previous message: Frederick Umminger: "Re: Definition of a Stationary Process, Part Deux"
- In reply to: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Ring of continuous real functions"
- Next in thread: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Ring of continuous real functions"
- Reply: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Ring of continuous real functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:06:25 -0800
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Jyrki Lahtonen wrote:
> Ok, help me out, please. What's the correct word?
> "overladen", "overlaid", something else?
>
overburdened, overlaid.
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Quantum Gravity Hypothesis"
- Previous message: Frederick Umminger: "Re: Definition of a Stationary Process, Part Deux"
- In reply to: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Ring of continuous real functions"
- Next in thread: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Ring of continuous real functions"
- Reply: Jyrki Lahtonen: "Re: Ring of continuous real functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
