Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal
From: Robert Israel (israel_at_math.ubc.ca)
Date: 11/25/04
- Next message: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Previous message: Herman Rubin: "Re: Determining number of roots of a polynomial"
- In reply to: E. E. Escultura: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Next in thread: Mensanator: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Reply: Mensanator: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Nov 2004 20:19:30 GMT
In article <200411251307.iAPD7cO10789@proapp.mathforum.org>,
E. E. Escultura <escultur36@hotmail.com> wrote:
He's back!
>This question of whether 1 = 0.99... which I used to call Ullrich-Israel
>equation has been resolved not only in the many papers I published but
The name does have a nice ring to it, but in all modesty I must
point out that I don't deserve any of the credit for this equation.
Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Next message: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Previous message: Herman Rubin: "Re: Determining number of roots of a polynomial"
- In reply to: E. E. Escultura: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Next in thread: Mensanator: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Reply: Mensanator: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Escultura affair: publication scandal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|