Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 11/25/04
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant?"
- In reply to: David Petry: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Next in thread: HERC777: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:53:20 -0500
In <25bac3c0.0411231413.38e4e990@posting.google.com>, on 11/23/2004
at 02:13 PM, david_lawrence_petry@yahoo.com (David Petry) said:
>If mathematics were seen as the science of phenomena observable in
>the world of computation,
If ware lilies were elephants they'd have trunks.
>then a very natural approach to the problem
>of artificial intelligence would be to teach computers mathematics.
I see that you don't know much about computers either. There have been
theorem proving systems for a long time.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant?"
- In reply to: David Petry: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Next in thread: HERC777: "Re: Cantor's Theory: Mathematical creationism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
