Re: JSH: At the Annals
From: James Harris (jstevh_at_msn.com)
Date: 11/28/04
- Next message: James Harris: "Re: JSH:Understanding constant terms"
- Previous message: patty: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- In reply to: gowan4_at_hotmail.com: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Next in thread: Richard Henry: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: Richard Henry: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: gowan4_at_hotmail.com: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: C. Bond: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Nov 2004 05:46:39 -0800
"gowan4@hotmail.com" <gowan4@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1101614200.290966.145460@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>...
> Well are you ever going to respond to the MATHEMATICAL criticisms of
> your work? Ranting about whether one of your critics is male or female
> is just a dodge to avoid facing up to reality. Or maybe you yourself
> aren't real? The more I read your postings the more I think that's
> true. If you are a real student of mathematics answer the mathematical
> criticisms.
What mathematical criticisms? The poster that calls himself or
herself "Nora Baron" or "Andrzej" simply rehashes things I've shot
down long ago.
It's an annoying habit. But it's also a way to see posters like
yourself who are just instigators who don't give a damn what's
actually going on.
Now then, if "Nora Baron" or "Andrzej" has a *mathematical* objection
then they can reply in a pertinent thread like in "JSH: Understanding
contant terms" or "JSH: Understanding polynomials" where I explain IN
DETAIL.
Posting instead in a thread where I simply inform that a paper has
gone to a journal is the dodge.
Hey, I LIKE talking about the mathematical argument, and this weird
she-he thing is just silly anyway, so why not move on over to the
threads I mentioned and try again?
Now for those of you who are still confused "Nora Baron" is a
palindrome, and the poster using that palindrome has ended a "Nora
Baron" post with the name "Andrzej", which is the kind of accident
that can happen when you're using a pseudonym.
Challenged on it, the poster now claims that "Andrzej" is a fictional
character, apparently trying to convince that the poster is a she, and
not a he.
Either way, you now know that you were being lied to and if you're
some guy who still wants to believe that "Nora Baron" is a girl, then
maybe you're just really lonely. But then, why don't you go to those
dating webpages?
And leave the mathematics to the real mathematicians?
James Harris
- Next message: James Harris: "Re: JSH:Understanding constant terms"
- Previous message: patty: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- In reply to: gowan4_at_hotmail.com: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Next in thread: Richard Henry: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: Richard Henry: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: gowan4_at_hotmail.com: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Reply: C. Bond: "Re: JSH: At the Annals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|