Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura
From: James Harris (jstevh_at_msn.com)
Date: 11/28/04
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: topology...~!"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- In reply to: Rupert: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: twisted_snakes_at_yahoo.com: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: C. Bond: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: Rupert: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: KeithK: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Nov 2004 06:52:52 -0800
rupertmccallum@yahoo.com (Rupert) wrote in message news:<d6af759.0411271901.4a62a25@posting.google.com>...
> jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0411271359.ca44e69@posting.google.com>...
> > I would like to pull out and highlight something interesting that E.
> > E. Escultura posted a few days ago, which I'd guess he's probably
> > talked about many times before, but I just noticed it and think it's
> > neat.
> >
> > First some more preamble as *by convention* as has been noted when I
> > brought up the subject of operator ambiguity before, sqrt(x) is taken
> > to be positive.
> >
> > So, by the convention, sqrt(4) = 2, and that's good as, -2(-2) = 4, so
> > if you say that sqrt(4) = 2 and sqrt(4) = -2, then 2 = -2, and 4 = 0,
> > which is not good.
> >
> > Naively then, you may believe that you can just say, take the positive
> > of the square root but as Escultura showed, that doesn't work:
> >
> > i = sqrt(-1) = sqrt(1/-1) = 1/i, giving -1 = 1. Contradiction.
> >
>
> If we make the convention that sqrt(-1)=i, then it's not true that
> sqrt(1/-1)=sqrt(1)/sqrt(-1).
>
So your assertion is that the substitution 1/-1 = -1 cannot be made?
The resolution is that the sqrt() operator gives TWO answers. It
always does, and convention can't force it to give only one answer.
So i = +/-sqrt(-1), where the +/- in front is a nod to the reality
that the result of using the square root operator is two solutions.
That's the operator ambiguity.
Naively you may believe that if you simply say, take only ONE answer
from the square root, and try to figure out some way to do it that you
can succeed, but you will always have a contradiction lurking.
The ambiguity extends to other operators like the cuberoot operator or
an infinity of other operators where you get more than one answer.
James Harris
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: topology...~!"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- In reply to: Rupert: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: twisted_snakes_at_yahoo.com: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: C. Bond: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: Rupert: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Reply: KeithK: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|