Re: Prime ideal proof
From: Arturo Magidin (magidin_at_math.berkeley.edu)
Date: 11/28/04
- Next message: Richard Schorn: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "[Another Successful Troll by Herc] (no longer mentions): Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times"
- In reply to: tj jackson: "Prime ideal proof"
- Next in thread: tj jackson: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Reply: tj jackson: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:11:54 +0000 (UTC)
In article <e9idneM4CMZ3qTfcRVn-uQ@adelphia.com>,
tj jackson <tj@removeofficeheadhunter.com> wrote:
>hello all,
>
>I have been racking my brain for hours trying to prove the following.
>
>P is a prime ideal of a ring R iff R / P is a prime ring
What is the definition of "Prime Ring"?
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu
- Next message: Richard Schorn: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "[Another Successful Troll by Herc] (no longer mentions): Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times"
- In reply to: tj jackson: "Prime ideal proof"
- Next in thread: tj jackson: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Reply: tj jackson: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]